Is Barefoot Running A Growing Trend Or A Passing Fad?
- Volume 23 - Issue 4 - April 2010
- 6323 reads
- 4 comments
Barefoot running has gained in popularity ever since last year’s publication of the book Born to Run. This book details the story of the Mexico-based Tarahumara Indians, who, for centuries, have regularly run barefoot at distances sometimes greater than a marathon.
One of the book’s claims is that the Tarahumara Indians can run barefoot for many miles without getting injured. Another claim is that there is no proof that the expensive running shoes sold by the running shoe industry are actually doing their job of preventing running injuries. The book suggests that runners should go back to how our earliest ancestors ran: barefoot.
The barefoot running advocates claim that running in shoes causes injuries. They also say that running barefoot is more natural and prevents injuries. One faction of the barefoot running community claims that the only way to reap the full benefits of barefoot running is by running shoeless while another faction says it is best to run in “minimalist shoes” that have thin soles and are lightweight. The barefoot advocates never talk about the thousands of runners who are able to run every day pain-free, without injury, because they are wearing running shoes.
I have had plenty of personal experience with the effects of running shoes on injuries and performance. I began competing in distance running at the age of 12. Due to various running injuries I suffered from running between 70 to 100 miles per week in high school, I sought the help of a local podiatrist. He made a pair of custom foot orthoses for me. These orthoses solved my running injuries for many years. I would not have been able to run all those years, relatively injury-free, without foot orthoses inside my running shoes.
My experimentation with barefoot running began over three decades ago when I was a distance runner at the University of California at Davis. Our coach would often have us do mile intervals on a grassy baseball field, which allowed many of us to run without shoes.
Rather than the near pound in weight that I carried on each foot with my size 12 training flats, the change to barefoot running allowed me to run about five seconds faster per mile than an equivalent effort while running in shoes. Barefoot running was a nice supplement to our training. However, it was not practical nor safe for all the hard miles and irregular surfaces we ran on during our training.
For years, runners have raced in lightweight shoes since they “felt faster” when doing so. Numerous scientific studies have confirmed that the metabolic economy of running is indeed improved when running with reduced mass on the feet. However, there have been very few serious distance runners who have actually raced while barefoot. The most notable exception was Abebe Bikila from Ethiopia, who won the Olympic marathon in Rome 50 years ago while running without shoes.
If running barefoot is a better and more natural way to run, as the barefoot running advocates claim, then why aren’t there more barefoot runners breaking the finishing tape at races? Are these talented runners worried they might injure themselves if they trained and raced barefoot? I think so.
As physicians, we must all be very careful of what we tell our patients to do. From a medicolegal standpoint, we are responsible for any recommendations we make regarding the types of shoes our patients should wear or whether they should wear shoes at all. Experienced runners know that the lightweight racing flats that have been available to train and race in ever since the early 1970s are just as light and thin as the “minimalist shoes” that the barefoot runners tout as being the “newest thing.”
If runners ask me whether running barefoot might be beneficial for them, I tell them they would be safer running in a lightweight racing flat. However, if they decide to run barefoot, they should do so at their own risk and on a safe surface to avoid injury. I also inform them that there is no scientific evidence that barefoot running produces any fewer injuries than running in shoes.