Keys To Ensuring Optimal Wound Debridement

Start Page: 28

What You Should Know About Debridement Coding Changes

Wound debridement codes have changed “dramatically” this year, according to Dr. Suzuki.
He notes the CPT codes for partial and full-thickness skin debridement (11040 and 11041) have been eliminated and the clinicians are instructed to report “by depth of tissue that is removed and by surface area of the wound,” according to the 2011 (CPT) Current Procedural Terminology book.4 As Dr. Suzuki explains, the clinicians are able to bill for the debridement of larger wounds (surface area over 20 cm2) by reporting the additional CPT codes, 11045 (subcutaneous over 20 cm2), 11046 (muscle and tendon over 20 cm2), and 11047 (bone over 20 cm2) respectively, in addition to 11042 to 11044.

Moreover, Dr. Suzuki says the 2011 CPT book suggests that one add up the surface area debrided per day. Then clinicians can report the CPT codes corresponding with the depth and the total surface area in 20 cm2 increments by appending with -59 modifiers if the wounds are on multiple body parts, according to Dr. Suzuki.

For example, if a patient has a large venous leg ulcer of 25 cm2 and you perform subcutaneous debridement, Dr. Suzuki says to report this as CPT codes 11042 (first 20 cm2) + 11045 (additional 20 cm2). If the wound area surfaces are 48 cm2, it would be 11042 (first 20 cm2) + 11045 (additional 20 cm2 x 2).

The most common misconception of the CPT codes for wound debridement, according to Dr. Suzuki, is that physicians should pick the CPT codes “using the deepest level of tissue removed.” This means that even if you see an exposed bone in the wound you are debriding, you should only report “subcutaneous debridement (CPT 11042)” if the tissue removed consists of subcutaneous tissue only.

As for the replacement of the “deleted” CPT codes 11040 and 11041, Dr. Suzuki notes the 2011 CPT book suggests using CPT codes 97597 (for the first 20 cm2) and 97598 (additional 20 cm2) for debridement of skin (epidermis and dermis only) and for “active wound care management.” He also suggests using an appropriate “E&M (evaluation and management)” code so you can include your skin debridement procedure provided within the physical exam and the medical management of the patient.

30
Author(s): 
Clinical Editor: Kazu Suzuki, DPM, CWS

Wound debridement is the foundation for successful and swift wound healing. Appropriate and timely wound debridement facilitates infection control by removing the biofilm over wound surfaces. Our expert panelists discuss best practices in wound debridement by reviewing the clinical evidence for wound debridement, patient education and insights on the vascular workup of patients with wounds.

Q:

What is the current clinical evidence and rationale of wound debridement?

A:

Richard Brietstein, DPM, notes that clinical evidence supports the importance of wound debridement. He stresses the necessity of reducing bacterial burden and removing senescent cells. Doing so stimulates normal cytological activity to rid the wound bed of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) and other inhibitory agents in order to develop granulation tissue, according to Dr. Brietstein.

   When it comes to evidenced-based medicine (EBM), Kazu Suzuki, DPM, CWS, notes the absence of definitive randomized controlled studies (RCTs) on wound debridement. Based on a recent Cochrane Review, he says there is enough clinical evidence to suggest that wound debridement using hydrogel was more effective than placebo for diabetic foot ulcers.1

    “Having said all of that, we may never establish excellent EBM on wound debridement as the standard of care practice denotes that most, if not all, wound patients should receive appropriate serial wound debridement on a weekly basis,” says Dr. Suzuki. “In other words, it is probably unethical not to provide wound debridement to wound patients as a control group.”

   Dr. Suzuki and David G. Armstrong, DPM, PhD, MD, both cite the diabetic foot ulcer study by Steed and colleagues for the becaplermin (Regranex, Healthpoint Biotherapeutics) gel trial, a multicenter trial based on 118 patients with diabetic foot wounds.2 The study authors established that a center that provided wound debridement 20 percent of the time healed the wounds approximately 20 percent of the time while another center that provided debridement 80 percent of the time healed approximately 80 percent of the patients.

   Dr. Armstrong also notes that subsequent studies, including those from his group, were able to control for other potentially confounding factors and support Steed and colleagues.3

    “To date, though, all of these have been post hoc in nature,” he cautions. “It is admittedly tough to do a robust randomized study effectively subjecting half of patients to what most believe is inferior care.”

   More recently, Dr. Suzuki says Cardinal and colleagues came to the same conclusion based on 366 venous leg ulcers and 310 diabetic foot ulcers, which showed higher healing rates with more frequent debridement.3

Q:

What do you tell your patient regarding the debridement?

A:

Dr. Suzuki tells patients that their wounds cannot heal unless physicians remove all the dead skin along with the bacteria that feeds on dead skin and old blood. He might educate patients on recent research into bacteria biofilm and its effect on chronic wounds. Dr. Suzuki says most of his patients get the concept of serial wound debridement.

   Dr. Brietstein informs patients there are many types of cells with different functions that exist at the bottom of their wound and that if the infected tissue and dead cells are not removed, normal healing cannot take place.

   Dr. Armstrong compares debridement to removing what is not viable and uses the analogy of pruning a tree. Similarly, with respect to perfusion deficit, Dr. Brietstein explains that “if you don’t water the lawn, the grass dies.” As he notes, patients understand this analogy and this makes it easier for patients to accept when he recommends an angiogram to help determine if they need an angioplasty or a formal bypass surgery to help facilitate wound healing.

image description image description


Post new comment

  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.