A Guide To Compression Dressings For Venous Ulcers

Nancy Slone-Rivera, MS, ANP-C, CWON, CFCN, and Stephanie C. Wu, DPM, MSc

1. Perrin M. Skin Necrosis as a complication of compression in the treatment of venous disease and in prevention of venous thromboembolism. Plebolymphology. 2008;15(1):27-30.
2. Callam MJ, Ruckley CV, Dale JJ, Harper DR. Hazards of compression treatment of the leg: an estimate from Scottish surgeons. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1987;295(6610):1382.
3. Khachemoune A KC. Management of leg ulcers. The Internet Journal of Dermatology. 2002;1(2).
4. Ennis W, Meneses P. Standard, appropriate and advanced care and medical-legal considerations: part two-venous ulceration. Wounds. 2003;15(4):107-22.
5. Harding K, Comerota AJ, Partsch H. Chronic Venous Insufficiency and Venous Ulceration: Etiology and Treatment. 2nd ed. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C.; Princeton, N.J., 2008.
6. Christopoulos D, Nicolaides AN, Cook A, Irvine A, Galloway JM, Wilkinson A. Pathogenesis of venous ulceration in relation to the calf muscle pump function. Surgery. 1989;106(5):829-35.
7. Araki CT, Back TL, Padberg FT, Thompson PN, Jamil Z, Lee BC, Duran WN, Hobson RW, 2nd. The significance of calf muscle pump function in venous ulceration. J Vasc Surg. 1994;20(6):872-7; discussion 8-9.
8. Dix FP BR, McCollum CN. Venous Disease is associated with an impaired range of ankle movement. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2003;25(6):556-61.
9. Back TL PF, Araki CT, Thompson PN, Hbson RW. Limited Range of motion is a significant factor in venous ulceration. J Vasc Surg. 1995;22(5):519-23.
10. Margolis DJ, Berlin JA, Strom BL. Risk factors associated with the failure of a venous leg ulcer to heal. Arch Dermatol. 1999;135(8):920-6.
11. Nicolaides AN, Hussein MK, Szendro G, Christopoulos D, Vasdekis S, Clarke H. The relation of venous ulceration with ambulatory venous pressure measurements. J Vasc Surg. 1993;17(2):414-9.
12. Partsch H. Understanding the pathophysiological effects of compression. In: Understanding Compression Therapy. European Wound Management Association (EWMA) position document. MEP Ltd., London, 2003:2-4.
13. Beidler SK DC, Berndt DF, Keagy BA, Rich PB, Marston WA. Inflammatory cytokine levels in chronic venous insufficiency ulcer tissue before and after compression therapy. J Vasc Surg. 2009;49(4):1013-20.
14. Cullum N, Nelson EA, Fletcher AW, Sheldon TA. Compression for venous leg ulcers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001(2):CD000265.
15. Dowsett C, Scanlon L. Compression bandaging and the clinical governance agenda. Br J Com Nurs. 2001;6(9):S17-S21.
16. Marston W, Vowden K. Compression therapy: a guide to safe practice. In: Understanding Compression Therapy. European Wound Management Association (EWMA) position document. MEP Ltd., London, 2003:2-4.
17. Thomas K. Compression bandaging in the treatment of venous leg ulcers. World Wide Wounds. 1997.
18. Clark M. Compression bandages: principles and definitions. In: Understanding Compression Therapy. European Wound Management Association (EWMA) position document. MEP Ltd., London, 2003:5-7.
19. Hampton S. Venous leg ulcers: short stretch compression therapy. Br J Nurs. 1997;6(17):990-8.
20. Top S, Arveschang AA, Fogh K. Do short-stretch bandages affect distal blood pressure in patients with mixed aetiology leg ulcers? J Wound Care. 2009;18(10):439-42.
21. Lentner A SF, Wienert V. Limitation of movement in the ankle and talo-calcaneonavicular joints caused by compression bandages. Phlebology. 1997;12:25-30.
22. Lindsay J MJ, Hampton S. Short Stretch compression bandage and the foot pump: their relationship to restricted mobility. J Wound Care. 2003;12(5):185-8.
23. Trent JT, Falabella A, Eaglstein WH, Kirsner RS. Venous ulcers: pathophysiology and treatment options. Ostomy Wound Manage. 2005;51(5):38-54; quiz 5-6.
24. Cornwall JV. Treating leg ulcers. J District Nursing. 1985:4(4):4-6,11.
25. Jones JE, Nelson EA. Compression hosiery in the management of venous leg ulcers. J Wound Care. 1998;7(6):293-6.
26. Castonguay G. Short-stretch or four-layer compression bandages: an overview of the literature. Ostomy Wound Manage. 2008;54(3):50-5.


As a disclosure, I am VP of Farrow Medical, which manufactures short stretch garments. This is a long comment.

I would like to clarify a point with regard to the definitions herein of inelastic versus short stretch, which I believe, as stated, allow for confusion, even historically, predating 2006.

I don't believe inelastic products are historically considered to be products with 30 to 70% stretch. In fact, Foldi specifically distinguishes between short stretch and inelastic.

Why would they be separated in textbooks and yet be referred to by others as the same or similar?

If a product with less than 15% stretch, as an example, is applied, there are several issues.
1. You are not really sure how much compression is being applied because the amount of compression is directly related to how hard the provider is pulling. Does the provider know how hard he is he is pulling? Does the next person applying know how hard he or she is pulling?
2. Products with this amount of stretch don't work terribly well over joints, such as the anterior ankle, and this can cause ulcerations.
3. True inelastic products are generally reserved in wound centers for patients with a low AB index, and they are applied with very little tension, meaning they are applying little if any significant resting compression. They depend upon a higher working compression to reduce/control edema.
4. If the leg decreases significantly in circumference as a result of higher working compression levels generated, the garment can slide down and the higher working compression advantage would be lost until readjusted.

"Short stretch" products are applied with some stretch and hence, inherent in that stretch is some tension, which translates into ~some~ compression. As the authors appropriately state, this compression level can fall of rather abruptly with time. Short stretch bandages, traditionally, are manufactured of 100% cotton and depend a good degree on the weave of the product to produce the tension and hence compression. So if a product which has some stretch but little sustained elastic compression of its own is applied near its maximal stretch, it would essentially function as inelastic, although if the leg reduced in size, it "might" shrink along with the leg, but also provide a lower working compression level.

If, however, a product with short (limited or low) stretch AND elastic fibers was used, the compression would not fall off as quickly and the performance would be hybridized with other elastic compression garments. By hybridized, I mean provide a steady lower resting compression (like a stocking) AND a higher working compression (more like inelastic).

Why is this important?

In my opinion, with elastic short stretch products ...
1. The short stretch can better cue you in to the amount of tension being applied by feeling the abruptness of the short stretch and hence the tension level.
2. The stretch allows for better functionality over joints.
3. The short stretch generally allows for more consistent low resting compression and higher working compression levels (working like a pump when the patient ambulates when properly applied). (It is sometimes referred to as a poor man's pump.)
4. The product can shrink some if the leg decreases in size, limiting slippage and the need for adjustments.

As a clinical example, in a chair-bound nursing home resident, a truly inelastic product that is properly applied might apply very little resting compression (or if too tight could be a tourniquet). A short stretch product with elastic fibers would apply some sustained resting compression with the potential for higher working compression when properly applied. Long stretch wraps have the potential to produce highest sustained resting compressions, which can be a little more hazardous if not professionally applied, and lower working compressions unless applied with a significant (potentially more dangerous) amount of tension.

Conversely, if a patient had poor arterial circulation, the provider may opt to apply a product that is "inelastic" with very little tension applied because a lower resting compression has a lower potential to block arterial circulation, but still has the potential to provide a higher working compression to help reduce/control edema. Note that this would work best if the calf muscle pump was functional.

One last point. A product that is inelastic applied and just barely snug would apply a low resting compression when vertical, but very little, if any, when lying down. Short stretch would apply more resting compression than inelastic when lying down. Long stretch would generally provide the most compression when lying down (and the least potential for high working compression when vertical). So patients with impaired arterial circulation are generally safer with inelastic, then short stretch products, when they lie down, as opposed to long stretch, IF compression is safe be applied at all depending on the situation.

Add new comment