Current Concepts In Diagnosing Chronic Diabetic Foot Ulcerations

Start Page: 60

What About Chronic Venous Stasis Ulcerations?

When patients report their history in a particular way, one can suspect chronic venous stasis ulceration. Often, this description will include discomfort that patients report as a deep aching sensation within their legs.

• “I had to stop wearing my compression stockings because they were making my legs swell.”
• “I just began noticing drainage on my stockings.”
• “I noticed water blisters on my legs but did not know what to do about them. Now I have sores on my legs that just will not heal.”

Fluid retention within the legs, ankles or feet is a hallmark of this condition. The pathomechanics for venous ulcer development includes inflammation that stimulates leukocyte activation, endothelial damage, platelet aggregation and intracellular edema. That sounds an awful lot like the mechanism for blood clot formation. Among the risk factors for venous ulcer development are older age, obesity, previous leg injuries, deep venous thrombosis and phlebitis.

In this instance, the chronic condition is venous stasis, not necessarily the ulceration. Often occurring on the medial ankle and associated with chronic pain, venous stasis ulcerations require therapy to address the wound as well as mechanisms to address fluid retention in the limb to reverse the process successfully. At times, the medical team employs medications to encourage diuresis when appropriate.

The use of compression hose is the mainstay in long-term management of venous stasis ulcers. Often, these modalities range from 20 mmHg compression to 30 mmHg compression. While elevation, the use of compression hose and local wound care can be effective, the risk and rate of recurrent ulceration is a reality. Researchers have demonstrated that surgical correction of superficial venous reflux reduces 12-month ulcer recurrence.46 In that study, the authors concluded that most patients with chronic venous stasis ulcerations will benefit from simple venous surgery. This conclusion was evident in the fact that 12-month ulcer recurrence rates were significantly reduced in the compression hose and surgery group in comparison to compression therapy alone (12 versus 28 percent).

With this in mind, I cannot overstate the importance of getting a vascular surgery consultation in the case of chronic venous stasis complicated by ulceration. Considering the data that 1 to 2 percent of the population will suffer from chronic venous ulceration, delayed healing times and increased incidence of recurrence are predictable.47,48 Recurrence rates are reportedly as high as 26 to 28 percent and one study reported a 68 percent recurrence rate.46,48-51 As many as 10 percent of the U.S. population may suffer from valvular incompetence in the venous system and 0.2 percent of those patients may develop an ulceration.52 It is understood that recurrent ulceration may occur in as many as 70 percent of those at risk.52

  • « Previous
  •  | Page 1 of 2 | 
  • Next »
71
Author(s): 
Molly Judge, DPM, FACFAS

References
1. Smith DM, Weinberger M, Katz BP. Predicting non elective hospitalization: a model based on risk factors associated with diabetes mellitus. J Gen Intern Med. 1987; 2(3):168–173.
2. Ramsey SD, Newton K, Blough D, McCullogh DK, Sandhu N, Reiber GE, Wagner EH. Incidence, outcomes and cost of foot ulcers in patients with diabetes. Diabetes Care. 1999; 22(3):382–387.
3. Heggers JP. Defining infection in chronic wounds: does it matter? J Wound Care. 1998;7(8):389–392.
4. Heggers JP, Robson MC, Doran ET. Quantitative assessment of bacterial contamination of open wounds by a slide technique. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1969;63(4):532–534.
5. Mangram AJ, Horan TC, Pearson ML, Silver LC, Jarvis WR. Guideline for prevention of surgical site infection. Am J Infect Control. 1999;27(2):97–134.
6. Raahave D, Friis-Moller A, Bjerre-Jespen K, Thiis-Knudsen J, Rasmussen L B. The infective dose of aerobic and anaerobic bacteria in postoperative wound sepsis. Arch Surg. 1986;121(8):924–929.
7. Robson MC. Lessons gleaned from the sport of wound watching. Wound Rep Regen. 1999;7(1):2–6.
8. Danielsen L, Balslev E, Döring G, Høiby N, Madsen S M, Ågren M, Thomsen HK, Fos HHS, Westh H. Ulcer bed infection. Report of a case of enlarging venous leg ulcer colonised by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. APMIS. 1998;106(7):721–726.
9. Lavery LA, Harkless LB, Felder-Johnson K, Mundine S. Bacterial pathogens in infected puncture wounds in adults with diabetes. J Foot Ankle Surg. 1994;33(1):91–97.
10. Madsen SM, Westh H, Danielsen L, Rosdahl VT. Bacterial colonisation and healing of venous leg ulcers. APMIS. 1996;104(12):895–899.
11. Pallua N, Fuchs PC, Hafemann B, Völpel U, Noah M, Lütticken R. A new technique for quantitative bacterial assessment on burn wounds by modified dermabrasion. J Hosp Infect. 1999;42(4):329–337.
12. Schraibman IG. The significance of beta-haemolytic streptococci in chronic leg ulcers. Ann R Coll Surg Med. 1990;7292(2):123–124.
13. Sehgal SC, Arunkumar BK. Microbial flora and its significance in pathology of sickle cell disease leg ulcers. Infection. 1992;20(2):86–88.
14. Annoni F, Rosina M, Chiurazzi D, Ceva M. The effects of a hydrocolloid dressing on bacterial growth and the healing process of leg ulcers. Int Angiol. 1989;8(4):224–228.
15. Eriksson G, Eklund AE, Kallings LO. The clinical significance of bacterial growth in venous leg ulcers. Scand J Infect Dis. 1984;16(2):175–180.
16. Gilchrist B, Reed C. The bacteriology of chronic venous ulcers treated with occlusive hydrocolloid dressings. Br J Dermatol. 1989;121(3):337–344.
17. Handfield-Jones SE, Grattan CEH, Simpson RA, Kennedy CTC. Comparison of a hydrocolloid dressing and paraffin gauze in the treatment of venous ulcers. Br J Dermatol. 1988;118(3):425–427.
18. Hansson C, Hoborn J, Moller A, Swanbeck G. The microbial flora in venous leg ulcers without clinical signs of infection. Acta Dermatol Venereol (Stockh). 1995;75(1):24–30.
19. Sapico FL, Witte JL, Canawati HN, Montgomerie JZ, Bessman AN. The infected foot of the diabetic patient: quantitative microbiology and analysis of clinical features. Rev Infect Dis. 1984;6(Suppl):171–176.
20. Trengove NJ, Stacey MC, McGechie DF, Mata S. Qualitative bacteriology and leg ulcer healing. J Wound Care. 1996;5(6):277–280.
21. Mendes J, Leandro C, Corte-Real S, et al. Wound healing potential of topical bacteriophage therapy on diabetic cutaneous wounds. Wound Rep Reg. 2013; 21(4):595–603.
22. Jelinek JE. Cutaneous manifestations of diabetes mellitus. Int J Dermatol. 1994; 33(9):605-17.
23. Huntley AC. Cutaneous manifestations of diabetes mellitus. Dermatol Clin. 1989;7(3):531-46.
24. Bauer M, Levan NE. Diabetic dermangiopathy: A spectrum including pretibial pigmented patches and necrobiosis lipoidica diabeticorum. Br J Dermatol. 1970;83(5):528-35.
25. Binkley GW, Giraldo B, Stoughton RB. Diabetic dermopathy: A clinical study. Cutis. 1967;3:955-8.
26. Perez I, Kohn R. Cutaneous manifestations of diabetes. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1994;30(4):519-31.
27. Muller SA. Dermatologic disorders associated with diabetes mellitus. Mayo Clinic Proc. 1966;41(10):689-703.

image description image description


Post new comment

  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.