A Closer Look At Total Ankle Replacement Revision

Thomas S. Roukis, DPM, PhD, FACFAS, and Mark A. Prissel, DPM

1. Carlsson ÅS. Revision of different ankle prostheses. In: Koföed H (ed): Current Status of Ankle Arthroplasty. Ch. 11, Springer, Berlin, 1998: pp. 50-56.
2. Easley ME, Adams SB, Hembree WC, DeOrio JK. Results of total ankle arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;93(15):1455-1468.
3. Gougoulias NE, Khanna A, Maffulli N. How successful are current ankle replacements? A systematic review of the literature. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468(1):199-208.
4. Roukis TS, Prissel MP. Registry data trends of total ankle replacement use. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2013;52(6):728-735.
5. Prissel M, Roukis TS. Incidence of revision following primary insertion of the STAR™ implant: A systematic review. Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 2013;30(2):237-250.
6. Teasdale R, Pfeffinger L, Murray WR. The total ankle arthroplasty: a joint too far (Published abstract presented at the Western Orthopedic Association). Orthop Transact. 1981;5:84.
7. van den Heuvel A, Van Bouwel S, Dereymaeker G. Total ankle replacement: Design evolution and results. Acta Orthop Belg. 2010;76(2):150-161.
8. Haddad SL, Coetzee JC, Estok R, et al. Intermediate and long-term outcomes of total ankle arthroplasty and ankle arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89(9):1899-1905.
9. Myerson MS, Won HY. Primary and revision total ankle replacement using custom-designed prosthesis. Foot Ankle Clin. 2008;13(3):521-538.
10. SooHoo NF, Zingmond DS, Ko CY. Comparison of reoperation rates following ankle arthrodesis and total ankle arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89(10):2143-2149.
11. Labek G, Klaus H, Schlichtherle R, et al. Revision rates after total ankle arthroplasty in sample-based clinical studies and national registries. Foot Ankle Int. 2011;32(8):740-745.
12. Labek G, Thaler M, Janda W, et al. Revision rates after total joint replacement: Cumulative results from worldwide joint register datasets. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011;93(3):293-297.
13. Alvine FG. Total ankle arthroplasty: New concepts and approach. Contemp Orthop. 1991;22(4):397-403.
14. Alvine FG. The Agility™ ankle replacement: the good and the bad. Foot Ankle. 2002;7(4):737-753.
15. http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/cdrh_docs/pdf5/K053569.pdf .
16. Alvine FG. Design and development of the Agility™ ankle. Foot Ankle Spec. 2009;2(1):45-50.
17. www.depuy.com/sites/default/files/products/files/DO_Agility_Ankle_Surgte... .
18. www.depuy.com/sites/default/files/products/files/DO_Agility_Ankle_LP_Sur... . Accessed: August 2, 2013.
19. Cerrato R, Myerson MS. Total ankle replacement: the Agility™ LP prosthesis. Foot Ankle Clin. 2008;13(3):485-494.
20. Claridge RJ, Sagherian BH. Intermediate term outcome of the Agility™ total ankle arthroplasty. Foot Ankle Int. 2009;30(9):824-835.
21. Gould JS. Revision total ankle arthroplasty. Am J Orthop. (Belle Mead NJ) 2005;34(8):361.
22. Groth HF, Fitch HF. Salvage procedures for complications of total ankle arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Rel Res. 1987;224:244-250.
23. Hintermann B. Complications of total ankle arthroplasty. In: Hintermann B (ed): Total Ankle Arthroplasty: Historical Overview, Current Concepts, and Future Perspectives. Ch. 11, Springer, New York, 2005, pp. 163-184.
24. Hintermann B. Salvage of failed total ankle arthroplasty, Procedure 26. In: Pfeffer GB, Easley ME, Frey C, Hintermann B, Sands AK. Ed. Operative Techniques: Foot and Ankle Surgery. Philadelphia: Saunders. 2010:325-340.
25. Hosman AH, Mason RB, Hobbs T, et al. A New Zealand national joint registry review of 202 total ankle replacements followed for up to 6 years. Acta Orthop. 2007;78(5):584-591.
26. Krause FG, Windolf M, Penner MJ, Wing KJ, Younger ASE. Impact of complications in total ankle replacement and ankle arthrodesis analyzed with a validated outcome measurement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;93(9):830-839.

Add new comment