Can We Improve Fusion Rates With Bone Marrow Aspirate?

Lindsay Mae Chandler, DPM, and Bob Baravarian, DPM, FACFAS

Foot and ankle surgeons often face the challenge of obtaining adequate bone healing in a timely fashion in patients with multiple risk factors for poor bone healing. Smoking, diabetes, Charcot, a history of high energy injury, multiple surgeries at an osseous surgical site, a history of delayed or nonunion, a history of avascular necrosis, alcohol abuse, immunosuppression, acute/uncontrolled infections, chronic infections, a poor soft tissue envelope and suboptimal vascularity are just a few of the many risk factors for poor bone healing.

   Careful preparation of opposing bone surfaces, compression across the arthrodesis or healing site, and the use of internal fixation to limit external stresses are all required for successful healing of bones and arthrodesis procedures. Loss of bony structure and volume is common at sites of fusion and fracture. Therefore, one may add bone graft to fill defects and/or increase the volume of bony mass.

   Surgeons commonly utilize bone grafts in reconstructive foot and ankle procedures. Historically, the autologous cortical and cancellous bone graft originated in the iliac crest and was considered the standard of care. In response to the potential morbidity associated with iliac crest bone graft, several techniques have emerged using other donor locations and modalities in order to obtain such grafts.

   Goujon first demonstrated the osteogenic capacity of bone in rabbits.1 Since the 1960s, some authors have shown that osteogenic stem cells in bone marrow are responsible for the biological efficacy of cancellous bone. Connolly and co-workers demonstrated a positive correlation between bone marrow osteogenic capacity and cell concentration, and researchers have successfully treated nonunions clinically with autologous bone marrow grafting alone in animal experiments.2

   Hernigou and colleagues have confirmed the effectiveness of concentrating bone marrow for the treatment of atrophic nonunions.3 However, the efficacy appears to be related to the concentration of progenitor cells in the graft. A concentration of five times or higher yielded a 100 percent fusion rate. Aspirating bone marrow from the iliac crest appears to be less than optimal in the absence of concentration.

   A successful bone graft must contain osteogenic progenitor cells as well as osteoconductive and osteoinductive material for optimal healing potential. Tiedeman and colleagues reported beneficial effects of osteoprogenitor cells found in autogenous bone marrow aspirates in an uncontrolled study.4 Research by Muschler and co-workers has led to improvement in obtaining a richer concentration of progenitor cells from the bone marrow harvest.5

Pertinent Pearls On Obtaining Bone Marrow Aspirate For Fusions

The lateral calcaneus is an alternative to iliac crest and proximal tibia donor sites. Surgeons should only choose this site when 30 mL of aspirate is required. This is commonly the case for a midfoot or forefoot procedure. Biomet’s BioCUE bone marrow concentration kit provides 80 percent recovery and eight times the concentration of mesenchymal stem cells.

   We make a small incision on the lateral side of the ankle, anterior to the insertion of the Achilles tendon down to the calcaneus. One would insert the BMA needle anterior to the Achilles tendon and posterior to the sural nerve. Position the BMA needle at a maximum depth through the calcaneus. Advance the trocar medial to dorsal from the insertion point. Proceed to insert the needle to a maximum depth of 3 cm or until you meet resistance from cortical bone on the side opposite the insertion point.

   Remove the trocar and connect the anticoagulant syringe to the BMA needle. Aspirate 2 to 4 mL of bone marrow, withdraw the needle an additional 1 cm and repeat the aspiration. Repeat this process until the BMA needle is positioned in cancellous bone. Postoperative pain at the aspiration site is rare.

Add new comment