Inside Insights On Negative Pressure Wound Therapy

Start Page: 24
Inside Insights On Negative Pressure Wound Therapy
Inside Insights On Negative Pressure Wound Therapy
Inside Insights On Negative Pressure Wound Therapy
Inside Insights On Negative Pressure Wound Therapy
Inside Insights On Negative Pressure Wound Therapy
28
Author(s): 
Clinical Editor: Lawrence Karlock, DPM

   As Dr. Bell notes, VAC therapy and other systems both remove exudates but the similarity ends there. Citing a recent published panel case study series, Dr. Bell notes that researchers were unable to conclude that another brand of NPWT showed evidence to support its use in wound healing.1 He says the sponge used in VAC therapy has proven to be superior to gauze as an interface to the wound bed. Gauze tends to absorb exudates and keep them in contact with the wound while the foam, due to its design and fluid repelling properties, allows for more efficient removal of exudates, according to Dr. Bell.

   “Bottom line, there is not a significant body of evidence supporting other NPWT systems in comparison to the large body of evidence that supports the use of VAC therapy,” summarizes Dr. Bell.

Dr. Bell is a board certified wound specialist of the American Academy of Wound Management, and a Fellow of the College of Certified Wound Specialists and the American Professional Wound Care Association. He is the founder and Director of the First Coast Diabetic Foot & Wound Management Center, Wound Care on Wheels, Wound Summit Outreach, Inc., and the Wound Care Consortium, all of Jacksonville, Florida. Dr. Bell is also the founder and Course Director of the Southeastern Interactive Wound Summit (SIWS), a multidisciplinary annual conference on advanced wound healing.

   Dr. Frykberg is the Chief of Podiatry at the Carl T. Hayden VA Medical Center in Phoenix.

   Dr. Rogers is a fellow at the Center for Lower Extremity Ambulatory Research (CLEAR) and a faculty member in the Department of Surgery at the Dr. William M. Scholl College of Podiatric Medicine. Dr. Rogers was an investigator on the randomized, controlled, multicenter trial of Vacuum Assisted Closure (VAC) Therapy in the treatment and blinded evaluation of diabetic foot ulcers.

   Dr. Travis practices at Beach Podiatry in California. He is on the teaching staff at Fountain Valley Regional Hospital and is involved in the Wound Care Program at La Palma Intercommunity Hospital.

   Dr. Karlock (shown at the left) is a Fellow of the American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons, and practices in Austintown, Ohio. He is the Clinical Instructor of the Western Reserve Podiatric Residency Program in Youngstown, Ohio. Dr. Karlock is a member of the Editorial Advisory Board for WOUNDS, a Compendium of Clinical Research and Practice.

   Editor’s note: For related articles, see “Closing Difficult Wounds” in the March 2006 issue of Podiatry Today and “Combining VAC Therapy With Advanced Modalities: Can It Expedite Healing?” in the September 2005 issue.

   Also be sure to visit the archives at www.podiatrytoday.com.




References:

Reference
   1.     Gupta S. Differentiating negative pressure wound therapy devices: an illustrative case series. Wounds 2007; 19, 1 Suppl:1-9.

image description image description


Post new comment

  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.