Revisiting A Proven Approach To Severe Ankle Instability
- Volume 17 - Issue 11 - November 2004
- 7359 reads
- 0 comments
Severe, acute or repetitive chronic inversion ankle sprains can often result in lateral instability of the lateral ankle complex. Although one can treat the vast majority of these conditions conservatively, a significant and unresponsive case may require surgical intervention. Over the course of the past two decades, improved soft tissue anchors and arthroscopic procedures have reduced the necessity of traditional open procedures.
However, these procedures can still play a vital role in the surgical management of this condition. Naturally, there are numerous procedures at the surgeon’s disposal, but the Christman and Snook (C.S.) procedure is one of the most widely recognized surgical interventions to address severe instability of the ankle.
Originally described in 1969, the C.S. procedure was originally a modification of a procedure documented by Elmslie in 1934. It involves harvesting a portion of the peroneus brevis tendon to recreate two pseudo-ligaments to stabilize the lateral ankle. The Winfield procedure actually describes this technique more accurately since it was originally devised by simply anchoring the portion of the peroneus brevis tendon into the lateral calcaneus.
Differentiating Between Ligamentous Laxity And True Instability
The anterior talofibular, the calcaneofibular and the posterior talofibular are the three ligaments that stabilize the lateral ankle. Instability may result from a severe injury or multiple repetitive injuries. Clinically, it is important to differentiate between simple ligamentous laxity and true instability. The patient history will likely indicate an instability on uneven surfaces but patients may occasionally suffer from this instability on flat surfaces as well. In my experience, chronic cases of instability often worsen with activity due to a gradual decrease in muscular splinting secondary to fatigue.
A physical examination may show anterior subluxation of the talus when bracing the tibia and pulling the heel forward. One may also see a deficit just superior to the opening of the sinus tarsi when the patient applies an inversion motion to his or her foot.
Radiographs may or may not provide a definitive diagnosis of this condition. Typically, a decision for surgical intervention is based on clinical exam, patient history and complaints. When one obtains radiographs, a difference of 20 degrees between the affected and unaffected side is usually indicative of significant instability. Avulsion fragments near the distal tip of the fibula may also suggest a significant previous injury.
Pertinent Step-By-Step Pearls
Although one may perform the procedure while the patient is supine or even prone, a lateral position is the easiest for performing the procedure. I prefer a “hockey stick” incision that begins approximately 6 cm superior and posterior to the distal tip of the fibula, and extends to the base of the fifth metatarsal. One should deepen this incision to the level of the sheath surrounding the peroneal tendons. I often orient myself by first defining the superior and inferior peroneal retinaculums.
Typically the only structure to avoid is the sural nerve. Since this type of incision is very large, I typically find postoperative numbness or nerve entrapment are two of the most common complications. (It is important to have a frank preoperative discussion with the patient about these possibilities.)